What incentives can be offered to keep men like Hatchett from shooting his powerful sperm into any woman who gives him the time of day?

Four years ago he had "only" 21 kids but apparently he has many more.

Father, 29, in child support court says he has 21 kids

As stated,I know it is probably Caucasoids,but can someone tell me which meta ethnicities?I always had though it was certain peoples around the Meditteranean basin and particularly Jews,but I am not too sure.I also heard it is an epidemic in Armenia and the Caucasus? Also among Australoids,I am curious to see what their rates are.

DISCLAIMER: I don't say this to be negative, and this is not meant to be a negative perspective. In fact, it is quite the opposite.

Personally, I think part of the problem is that being 'single' is viewed as a negative thing. True, as humans we all desire the companionship of another human being at some point or another, and eventually we all get this companionship, even if it doesn't necessarily last forever. But somehow, we all get this idea, that EVERYONE is meant to find that someone to spend forever with. When in reality, some people are probably better off alone or don't make great long-term partners. Do you really think serial killers and child molesters deserve a wife and family? What about those men who beat their wives? The men- aren't deserving of it. And the women... are probably better off alone than with one of those scumbags. Sadly, some of the 'undeserving' ones are able to find a long-term mate. While some with the more 'deserving' qualities, sometimes have difficulty finding one. And we worry about finding Mr. or Mrs. right, because we have this belief that we are ALL entitled to a loving relationship. Our time on this Earth is borrowed, and no one is entitled to anything. The same way some people work hard all their lives and never get rich, some of us work hard on being a good 'boyfriend' or good 'girlfriend', like those who work hard, of course, we'll all get SOMETHING out of it, but not all of us hit the jackpot.

A lot of the older women in my family (50s and 60s) are single and didn't find 'the one'. Yet, they live happy and wholesome lives. Of course, they fell in love a few times in their life. But they were either in good relationships that just happened to fall apart, or bad ones that were better off getting out of. That doesn't mean there is something wrong with them. In fact, some people function more efficiently when they are not in a relationship than in one.

MY ideal in a relationship, isn't someone who completes me, but someone who complements me. Brings out the best in what I already have. Someone who I can share my talents, dreams, and ambitions with. Someone we can make something out of our lives together with. Someone who builds you up, not brings you down. And they have to be a little competitive, 'cause with competitiveness, there is arguing and just a little bit of arguing, is supplemental to a relationship because it challenges you to think, and if they are competitive, they will try to outdo you, and you will try to outdo them, and before you know it, you'll be better each other that way, and it will never be boring. Everyday will be a challenge, but a healthy one. And If I can't find that, I'd rather be alone.

I wont respond personal attacks and it is not my intention to attack you or the Peruvians, so i don't care.
You don't have to believe me, I will just post some facts sustaining my point with the respective objective sources:




1) Middle East population in Latinamerica is not only Christians, there are a numerous population of Jewish and Muslims:
Sources:




2) Middle East Christians and Jewish in LatinAmerica go along and help each other, specially because the food, traditions and values are similar regardless their beliefs. They all immigrated together
Sources:




3) Muslims in Latinamerica made it a better place and have a big impact in culture.
Sources:



3) Muslims in Latinamerica are involved in the society and considered valuable members of the society.
Sources:


1) LatinAmerica is not a single country.
2) Muslims living in LatinAmerica have the same rights than anyone else
3) Muslim living in Brazil or Argentina are more Brazilian or Argentinian than you and have more rights, you are Peruvian and not a pan LatinAmerican.
4) Muslim and other Middle east groups including Jewish, Christians and Atheist have a privileged position in the society, they are in a Power position and don't have to give explanations to you.
They are into politics, communication, science and business and arts, usually live in the best neighbourhoods and they deserve that because they study and work hard.
Sao Paulo (Richest city in LatinAmerica) most powerful groups are the Italians, Greeks, Germans and Middle Eastern (Muslim, Christian, Jewish or Atheist).

Sources:

how many people in Mexico are middle-class according to western standards?

So, what is everyones take on who exactly these tribes are?
There's the 'Black Hebrew Israelites' who believe Afram, Latinos and Native Americans descend from those tribes, then there's Brit-Am, the people who believe the English descended from the children of Israel and of course the theory of Pakhtuns and Kashmiri ethnics having supposed links to the lost tribes of Israel.

What is everyone elses opinions or takes on this topic?

One thing that's really puzzled and annoyed me in such forums. What is this obsession with being labelled "white" or being labelled "European"? And we all know how subjective those terms are to start with :lol:

Why are people intent on having their ethnic groups labelled into such subjective constructs? Whatever happened to just focusing to your ethnic group's label and the unique characteristics and elements that come with it? I just see this obsession of being labelled white as so one-dimensional and petty. For example, cramming Irish, Welch people with Greek, Bulgarian people under one label is just moronic in my view. For the record, I'm not one of the people on the other hand that ignores that there are different races and different people, I just view this obsession of being labelled under such terms a bit childish at times. I think we have to be more "localised" in viewing ethnic groups rather than trying to look at it at such a large scale thus blurring the many differences that exist...

Hello :thumbsup:

I thought I would post my results as that seems to be quite popular here.
Then maybe you can help me solve a little bit of a mystery.

Paternal Haplogroup: R1b1b2a1a
Maternal Haplogroup: T2b2

Europe100%
Asia0%
Africa0%

Northern Europeans - 67.96
Southern Europeans - 67.86
Near Easterners - 67.23
Central Asians - 66.98
Northern Africans - 66.48
North Americans - 66.16
Siberians - 66.12
South Americans - 66.04
Eastern Asians - 65.8
Oceanians - 65.67
Eastern Africans - 63.48
Southern Africans - 63.34
Central Africans - 63.31
Western Africans - 63.27

I did quite a bit of research into my family history before signing up to 23andme. My direct male line is from Cornwall via my great great grandfather, and my direct female line is also from Cornwall thanks to my great great grandmother. Almost everyone else in between is from Yorkshire, with a handful from nearby Derbyshire and County Durham.
I have only found one person not born in England, and he was Irish.

This leaves me a little confused regarding my Dodecad results. As you will see, I am somewhat different from the average British/English person and I just don't understand why. On some tests I come out as being pretty close to Orkadian, and on others I match "Mixed Germanic" quite closely. Being from Yorkshire, I expected to be perhaps a little bit closer to Scandinavia, but I also have a much larger South Western component than your average Englishman. This doesn't seem to be explained by the Cornish influence either.

EURO7
6.97% Caucasus
48.49% Northwestern
18.90% Northeastern
7.41% Southeastern
0.03% African
0.02% Far_Asian
18.18% Southwestern

K7B
0.75% South_Asian
11.40% West_Asian
0.53% Siberian
0.00% African
14.54% Southern
72.79% Atlantic_Baltic
0.00% East_Asian

DIY Dodecad V3
9.90% East_European
52.74% West_European
28.06% Mediterranean
0.00% Neo_African
8.36% West_Asian
0.56% South_Asian
0.09% Northeast_Asian
0.00% Southeast_Asian
0.00% East_African
0.07% Southwest_Asian
0.22% Northwest_African
0.00% Palaeo_African

k12a
39.48% Mediterranean
0.00% Far_Asian
0.27% Siberian
44.12% North_European
0.07% South_Asian
0.00% West_African
8.55% Caucasus
7.18% Gedrosia
0.00% East_African
0.31% Southwest_Asian
0.00% Southeast_Asian
0.02% Northwest_African

k12b
9.13% Gedrosia
0.16% Siberian
0.14% Northwest_African
0.00% Southeast_Asian
39.38% Atlantic_Med
42.32% North_European
0.48% South_Asian
0.00% East_African
0.15% Southwest_Asian
0.00% East_Asian
8.23% Caucasus
0.00% Sub_Saharan

WEAC
79.13% Atlantic-Baltic
20.43% Near-East
0.41% Far-East
0.03% Africa

World9
0.01% Amerindian
0.00% East_Asian
0.00% African
72.78% Atlantic_Baltic
0.00% Australasian
0.87% Siberian
12.09% Caucasus_Gedrosia
13.40% Southern
0.85% South_Asian

Anyway those are my results. Hopefully this will provide something interesting for you all. Any suggestions on what to do next would be great, I have already uploaded to Gedmatch and done the Eurogenes tests etc there, but haven't found a database to compare my results to.

Can it eliminate all or at least most genetic diseases? Of course, it can't prevent new mutations from taking place, but it can eliminate the deleterious genes which are already present, right? If so, to what degree? Can it really create a "master race"? Can it achieve, say, a 30 pt average IQ increase? Can it undo thousands of years of evolution and turn, say, the Negritos into a tribe of tall, muscular athletes? Can it backfire and cause an increase in serious genetic diseases or a significant drop in IQ?

Basically what I'm asking is how far can it go? And, how can it backfire and become detrimental to a population?

Or, in other words, which race has the hottest body?

What draws beautiful women to repulsive men? I see it all the time, beautiful women with slightly less-than-perfect to downright brutal looking guys. What's the deal?

Someone told me that women actually prefer ugly dudes because they think they're less likely to cheat or be approached and seduced by other women. Is this true?

If anyone remembers, I stated that my father was Mex-Am (Sonora/Alta California), my mother was Euro-Am (swede/Brit/Ger) .

My results are; 83.7% Euro (70.5% is western Euro, )
1.7% mideast (Turk/Iran)
14.6% Native American

:thumbsup:

I am STOKED!!


It confirms our genealogy research that we've had going on several yrs.

I decided to make a thread like this here where all my family members are in one thread rather then some here and there ect, this is essentially a copy of the one i made over at apricity, with the exception of the updated AF scores ect.


Both my maternal and paternal ancestry is from Western Norway (here painted red):




First my maternal and paternal lines:

Mine:

YDNA: R1b1b2a1a2f*
mtDNA: U5b1b1(T16192C)


Maternal Uncle:

YDNA: R1b1b2a1a2d3*
mtDNA: U5b1b1(T16192C)

Maternal Grandmother:

mtDNA: U5b1b1(T16192C)

Paternal aunt:

mtDNA: H13a1a


Ancestry paintings/Chromosome paintings (mcDonalds and Eurogenes K13 in that order):

Me:



Maternal Uncle:



Maternal grandmother:



Paternal aunt:



Admixture scores (Eurogenes K13 and Dodecad dv3 in that order):


Mine:



Maternal uncle:


Maternal grandmother:



Paternal aunt:



Default Ancestry finder results and then 5cM, both at 4gp:



Mine:

Default:
5cM:

Maternal uncle:

Default:
5cM
Maternal grandmother:

Default:
5cM:
Paternal Aunt:

Default:
5cM:
Ashkenazi Jewish score at 1+gp and 5cM:

Mine:
Maternal uncle:
Maternal grandmother:
Paternal aunt:


Most unexpected/strange top 3 unknown Relative finder cousin:

Mine:

Maternal uncle:

Maternal grandmother:

Paternal aunt:

Genetic ties:

So far ive found German ties via my maternal aunt, which is linked to the Hansa league in all likelihood, this i see in a number of ways, i found lots of German cousins at RF and also at default AF levels i see Germany as her second highest % at 0,5%.

Ive also found Tatar ties to Russia via my maternal side using RF, i see it both in my uncle and grandmother, but strongest in my uncle, this i think is because both my maternal grandfather and grandmother came from approximately the same place and so they were likely related distantly at least and so any Tatar ancestry that came into this gene-pool would have spread like wildfire..so far with Davids help over at eurogenes we have tracked the linage (to quote him):



Via my paternal side i found strong ties to Iceland and the Faeroe isles and from there onto the UK, these i guess are from the middle ages when Norway was at its peak in terms of colonial settling and trading with Europe, so around 12-1300's.

ok thats enough for now...