I always thought she had a Latina vibe.

Would this man blend in with the average people from your country or would he mistaken for a foreigner? If mistaken for a foreigner, what would he be mistaken as?

I would say rounded and softer features. Like a round face, rounded forehead, full lips, big eyes, concave nose etc. as to where more streamlined features make one look older (sharp features, thin lips, long straight nose etc.)

I have all the round features and people think I'm 16 :(

The Polish individualist morphological school of Ireneusz Michalski (1949) recognised 17 world racial types and 36 composites [54 race types in total]. For the full criteria for each type see Michalski & Henzel, 1955. Michalski added several more composites to his later lists, bringing the total to over 70.

Types

White variety

1. Nordic (A)
2. Mediterranean (E)
3. Cromagnonoid (Y) [1]
4. Armenoid (H)
5. Oriental (K)

Yellow variety

6. (Classic) Mongoloid (M)
7. Arctic (I)
8. Lapponoid (L)
9. Highland (Q)
10. Pacific (Z)

Black variety

11. Negroid (N) [2]
12. Pygmic (O)
13. Sudanese (S)
14. Equatorial (X)
15. Australoid (T) [3]

Transitional variety

16. Ainuid (P) [4]
17. Berberian (B) [5]

Hybrids

White

18. Northwestern (AE)
19. Dinaric (AH)
20. Atlantic (YE)
21. Pseudo-Alpine (YH)
22. Littoral (EH)
23. Teutonic (AY)
24. Amoritic (AK)
25. Suboriental (EK)
26. Subrmenoid (KH)

White-Yellow
27. Chukhonic (AQ)
28. Sublapponoid (EL)
29. Eurasiatic (AZ)
30. Alpine (HL)
30. Baltic (YL)
31. Subnordic (AL)
32. Usunian (YZ)
33. Pseudo-Cromagnonoid (YQ)
34. Submongoloid (EM)
35. Ladinian (EZ)
36. South-Eastern (EQ)
37. Western-Asiatic (KL)
38. Kipchakian (KM)
39. Aralian (KZ)
40. Caspian (KQ) [6]
41. Turanian (HM)
42. Anatolian (HZ)
43. Pseudo-Littoral (HQ)

White-Black

44. Rehobot (AN)
45. Nordic-Pygmic (AO)
46. Nordic-Sudanese (AS)
47. Nordic-Equatorial (AX)
48. Rephaitic (YK)
49. Hamitic (BE)
50. Aegean (AB)
51. Riffean (YB)
52. Kushitic (BK)
53. Levantinian (BH)
54. Euro-Negroid (EN)
55. Ethiopian (ES)
56. Eritrean (EX)
57. Khoinian (KN)
58. Meridional (KS)
59. Pseudo-Meridional (KX)
60. Armenoid-Negroid (HN)
61. Aswanese (HS)
62. Dongolan (HX)
63. Berberic-Bushmanoid (BN)
64. Mediterranean-Pygmic (EO)

Yellow

65. Kwangtung (LQ)

~ To be expanded

Yellow-Black

66. Berberoid (BL)
67. Subhimalayan (BZ)
68. Pseudo-Hamitic (BQ)
69. Pacific-Negroid (ZN)
70. Pacific-Pygmic (ZO)
71. Berberic-Highland (BQ)

Black

72. Pygmic-Australoid (OT) [7]

~ To be expanded

Sources

Michalski, I. (1949). "Struktura antropologiczna Polski". Acta Anthropologica Universitatis Lodziensis. I(7). pp. 1-236.
Michalski, I., Henzel T. (1955). "Podstawy klasyfikacji czlowika w ujeciu Tadeusza Henzli i Ireneusza Michalskiego". Przegl. Antrop. 21(2). pp. 537-667.
Michalski, I. (1958). "Remarks About The Anthropological Structure of Europe". [In:] Publications of the Joint Arabic-Polish Anthropological Expedition. Part II.

Notes

[1] Synonymous with Czekanowaski's Paleoeuropid.
[2] Michalski's Negroid is Bushmanoid [Wiercinski: Bushmenoid] his Sudanese is Sudanid (Negroid).
[3] In most schemes outside of the Polish indiivdualist school Australoids are not considered "Black".
[4] Synonymous with the Amurian of Birdsell, the "Archaic White" of Cole and Czekanowaski's "Palaeo-Asiatic" which is quasi-archaic-Caucasoid but shows some Mongoloid traits, although others have regarded it as a White-Yellow crossing.
[5] Synonymous with Wiercinski's Berberic, and Baker's Aethiopid, shows a wide spectrum of White-Black traits. It is also loosly synonymous with Czekanowaski's and Klimek's "Mediterranoid" (White-Transitional to Black -- Kroeber).
[6] Has nothing in common with the Caspian (Proto-Nordic) of Dixon.
[7] Synonymous with Melanesid.

http://polycentrism.blogspot.co.uk/2...kis-types.html

Where in Europe you are more like to find 'yellow' skin?

'I can create Neanderthal baby, I just need willing woman’

A scientist has said it would be possible to clone a Neanderthal baby from ancient DNA if he could find a woman willing to act as a surrogate.

The process would not be legal in many countries and would involve using DNA extracted from fossils.

George Church, a genetics professor of Harvard School of Medicine, said that the process was possible and that far from being brutal and primitive, Neanderthals were intelligent beings.

They are believed to be one of the ancestors of modern man and became extinct 33,000 years ago. He added that altering the human genome could also provide the answers to curing diseases such as cancer and HIV, and hold the key to living to 120.

He told Der Spiegel, the German magazine: “I have already managed to attract enough DNA from fossil bones to reconstruct the DNA of the human species largely extinct. Now I need an adventurous female human.”

The professor claims that he could introduce parts of the Neanderthal genome to human stem cells and clone them to create a foetus that could then be implanted in a woman.

Prof Church helped start the Human Genome Project that mapped human DNA and is well respected in the field. His comments will surprise most geneticists who believe that cloning humans is unacceptable. It is illegal in Britain.

Prof Church said: “We can clone all kinds of mammals, so it’s very likely that we could clone a human. Why shouldn’t we be able to do so?”
He added: “Neanderthals might think differently than we do. We know that they had a larger cranial size. They could even be more intelligent than us.

“When the time comes to deal with an epidemic or getting off the planet or whatever, it’s conceivable that their way of thinking could be beneficial. They could maybe even create a new neo-Neanderthal culture and become a political force. The main goal is to increase diversity. The one thing that is bad for society is low diversity.”

Prof Church said the technique would involve artificially creating DNA from fossilised material and introducing this into human stem cell lines. He discusses his idea in his latest book, Regenesis: How Synthetic Biology Will Reinvent Nature and Ourselves.

He rules out recreating older human ancestors or dinosaurs, as was the subject of the Jurassic Park films, because the age limit of useful DNA is about one million years, he said.

He told the magazine: “One of the things to do is to engineer our cells so that they have a lower probability of cancer.

“And then once we have a lower probability of cancer, you can crank up their self-renewal properties, so that they have a lower probability of senescence [ageing].”

One of the strangest things I have seen. I dug it up in an old German physical anthropological journal.

Sulcus medialis apicis nasi - Nasal tip median depression



Who has ever seen this in person?

Hi,

I joined this Forum, because I read about one of the Thread about Sino Tibetan Peoples in this Forum from Internet Search Results.

I am absolutely Fascinated by the Sino Tibetan Ethnic Minority Peoples from Central and Southern China, so that's why I created a Forum Account.

My Teacher and Friends had taught Me that actually We Human Beings never Evolved Physically, our Variation is because of Social Selection.

This Means that We Human Beings Genetically have all the Physical Features of the Human Race's contained in our Genes.

Our Social Selection is also to do with Human Physiology as well, Say if Someone wanted their Child to look in a certain way, then our Body would Activate the Gene, and eventually their Child or Grandchild would become the look the Person Desired in 1 - 3 Generations ago.

And My Teacher told Me 'why do Ancient Peoples look different to Modern Chinese People??

It is because of Social Selection for example the Ancient Chinese Peoples inherited what they looked like Physically but have what modern Chinese Peoples look like Genetically, however for the Case of Modern Chinese Peoples it is the other way around.

My Teacher and Friends are all so Extremely Academically Able and I Truly believe only in their Knowledge, they do Frown Upon Terms like 'Nordsinid and Middlesinid' because they Disagree with these Theories.

But I did ask My Friends Curiously about ' Tungid, Northsinid and Middlesinid etc, and they do know this is about.

And NorthSinid Social Selected into MiddleSinid Many Generations later. Modern Middlesinid Han Chinese Peoples is Descendents of Ancient Northsinid Han Chinese Peoples.

I have read in this Forum or in another Similar Forum, that apparently 'Manchu Peoples and Yi peoples are so called 'Northsinid and the Miao & Qiang & Tibetan and Bai Peoples are so called 'Middlesinid'

My Friends told Me, that actually Manchu People's Social Selection are Strictly speaking in-between north and Middle-sinid.

The Photos of Yi Peoples I seen in these Forums is from the Internet, and these Individuals are considered as 'Northsinid'

I do have a look Internet Photos of Yi Peoples,and I noticed that they have very very very Short Face and Nose and Un straight Eyes and Nose, and are no where near as pretty as what over 95% of the Yi Peoples look like in real life.

And Apparently Miao and Bai Peoples are Middlesinid and they have Short Face and Nose and far Shorter Face and Nose than NorthSinid Manchu and Yi Peoples.

However over 95% of the Miao & Qiang & Bai and Tibetan Peoples in real life have Faces and Noses which is Irrelevant to be desribed as 'Narrow' their Face and Nose is like 3 times and over the Longest Face Person in the World, their Face and Noses are Extremely Beyond Beyond Narrow, and they have extremely Straight Eyes and Nose, and their Face & Eyes and Nose Shapes are beyond Stunningly Beautiful.

And over 95% of the Miao, Qiang, and Tibetan Peoples are Extremely beyond Tall in Height Rather than 'Short, they're not Short at all !!

And I must say all the Ethnic Minorities of Central and Southern China are Physically Indistinguishable from the Yi Peoples .

I have seen Internet Photos of Miao Dong, Hani, Tibetan, Jing, Qiang and Yi Peoples, well they do not look at all like what the Majority of their Tribe look like.

And I read that In terms of Dress-style, the Miao, Yi and all the Ethnic Minorities of Central and Southern China wear Traditional Clothing which is Completely different to one another,

However all the Ethnic Minorities of Central and Southern China have Some Dress-styles which is Completely the same and Indistinguishable from one another's Tribe.

If you have Facebook, please be welcome to have a look at My Photo Albums, it's all Photos of the Sino Tibetan Peoples of Central and Southern China, sadly I found all the Photos from the Internet, and I must say they don't look ' Typical' of what their Tribe look like.

https://www.facebook.com/yucheongben...2305272732%3A6

(some individuals may comprise local influences)

pred. Alpine (Turanid = Europoids with Mongoloid/East Alpine traits) = round face with high cheekbones, almond eyes/narrow eye shapes, oftenly skinny body...

Belarusian fooballers;
1.

2.

3.

4.

5.

6.

7.

8.

9.

10.

11.

12.

13.

I have noticed that there seems to be a general correlation between ignoble Neo-Nazi behaviour and fattish, baby-faced and snub-nosed phenotypes.

Where I live, this general type of morphology is heavily overrepresented in thuggish Nationalist circles.



Though we have our fair share of lean Aurignacoid individuals, they rarely turn out to support the Neo-Nazi cause. Might there be an actual causation at play here? Do psychological traits that correlate with phenotypes of the brachycephalised Cromagnoid spectrum yield a greater general incidence of participation in group delinquency in such individuals?

The "type" is have in mind is specifically referred to as "Borreby" or "Baltid" depending on convention and ethnicity.

Abstract

According to archaeological records and historical documentation, Italy has been a melting point for populations of different geographical and ethnic matrices. Although Italy has been a favorite subject for numerous population genetic studies, genetic patterns have never been analyzed comprehensively, including uniparental and autosomal markers throughout the country.

Autosomal ancestry in Italy

"...A panel of 52 AIMs was genotyped in 435 Italian individuals in order to estimate the proportion of ancestry from a three-way differentiation: sub-Saharan Africa, Europe and Asia. Structure analyses allowed us to infer membership proportions in population samples, and these proportions can be graphically displayed, as in Figure 2. This analysis indicated that Italians have a basal proportion of sub-Saharan ancestry that is higher (9.2%, on average) than other central or northern European populations (1.5%, on average). The amount of African ancestry in Italians is however more comparable to (but slightly higher than) the average in other Mediterranean countries (7.1%)."


Source:
http://www.plosone.org/article/info:...e-0050794-g002

There's many a thing to be found on the net about braindamaging conditions that occur when one repeatedly receives concussions through blows to the head, though, I was wondering what ABF thought of this.

Namely, how severely damaging are sports like kickboxing, MMA and boxing to the brain? Where does one draw the line where training become dangerous? (ex.: once a week controlled sparring to the head, too much already, or not dangerous?)

Also, knowing the significant risks that competition fighters sustain permanent damage, what should be done to protect the fighters?

In my opinion, there's not nearly enough attention for these conditions; many fightfans know what being punch drunk is, and how it's caused, but many seem to be of opinion that it's "part of the job", as long as they see it in others, but seem to think that it won't befall upon them.

I think for children competition fighting should be prohibited altogether, and for those that want to fight in the ring, they should be made properly aware of the risks, and receive a mandatory CT-scan after a fight or a KO in training. (second thoughts: too pricey probably)



Two articles after a quick google search:
http://jnnp.bmj.com/content/53/5/373.full.pdf
http://archneur.jamanetwork.com/arti...ticleid=792347

Can anyone help me by finding me this paper please?

Human Domestication Reconsidered
Helen M. Leach

http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/368119