I am not sure what I can categorize with eugenic.

There are 3 eugenic movement.

1. Fascist. Government decide those who are unworthy and neutralize or sterilize them. Quite often, our smartest subspecies, like the jews, are the one getting slaughtered. I am against this.
2. Techie. My kids can regrow limbs. Okay that's cool. But it's kind of freaky and can't be done on large scale yet. I think it's people's right to do so.
3. Libertarianism. Yap simple normal standard libertarianism without even trying to be eugenic.

I believe that the third way will naturally improve humans' genetic ability as a very nice side effect. Yap the 3rd is actually very eugenic and that's what I want to explain.

This is what I want to promote. Most people in western civilization think that libertarianism will be disgenic. I think the opposite.

Libertarianism varies but it at least support decriminalization of:
1. Explicit sugar babies agreement (currently illegal due to anti prostitution laws)
2. Consensual women trafficking (currently illegal despite consent under contemporary)
3. Porn
4. Drugs or saver drugs like ganja.


In addition, libertarianism support decoupling of redistribution of wealth to number of kids/anything. Pure libertarianism oppose redistribution of wealth at all. Some moderate ones like milton friedman advocate negative income tax.

Why will this be eugenic?

I think the real reason behind dysgenic tendency doesn't come from free market. It comes from government.

1. Monogamy actually ration females in equal share for everyone. It ensures the dumbest most stupid and violent males will get a wife anyway. Sugar babies eliminate this issue.
2. Anti women trafficking laws prevent women in countries where they are oppressed from fleeing to better countries with better system and richer males. If women can consensually move, males in every countries will have strong incentive to make their country rich, embrace capitalism, etc. Women will be less oppressed everywhere. And all countries will be richer.
3. Even though most women prefer the rich, not all are pretty enough to get rich males. Well, porn will ensure that the ugly don't get picked.
4. Cheap availability of drugs will give the poor and "fuck up" people something else fun to do besides breeding.
5. Currently government spend so much money supporting "our children", which often is simply not ours. This provide strongest incentive to breed especially among the poor. Welfare recipients deliberately produce many kids so they can collect more food stamps. If government spend the same amount of money for those with kids and those without, that incentive will be reduced.

So what do you think?