Donate Now
Goal amount for the next month: 180 EUR, Received: 0 EUR (0%)
By donating, you not only support the continued existence of this site, you also improve this site in various ways, by making it affordable for ForumBiodiversity to upgrade the server with better hardware and licensed non-free proprietary software, but also motivating the staff to work harder. ABF will always be free of charge (gratis) to use. However, if everyone donates a small monthly amount, it makes a tremendous difference for the forum's overall quality in the long haul.
The fact that this poster thinks there ia lot of ydna I in Iran or Kurdistan is laughable. One controversial study showed I. That study was pretty much wrong. Ydna I is almost nonexistant in iran and Kurdistan. I don't know what caused this poster to say it is present in Pakistan (I have heard similar claims about the Kalash) but I don't think evenone sample has been found and the claim was even more laughable than it existing in Kurdistan or Iran.
Plus the frequency of mtdna I is 2% among Assyrians, 5 % among Azeris and 4% among Armenians and close to 9% among Pakistani Sindhis. All of these populations have no I.
So where is this theory of correlation coming from? I have seen it on numerous forums and sites.
Mtdna and ydna I
Reply With Quote
Originally Posted by Newtoboard
