User Tag List

Results 1 to 4 of 4

Thread: SETI at 50 years old3447 days old

  1. #1
    Amnesty Member
    Rara Avis Angevin's Avatar
    Last Online
    2016-07-30 @ 03:36
    Join Date
    2009-11-15
    Posts
    1,037
    Location
    New York USA
    Gender
    Age
    41
    Metaethnos
    Celto-Germanic-Romance
    Ethnicity
    Insular French
    Phenotype
    mostly Atlanto-med
    Politics
    French Dictatorship
    Religion
    Atheist
    Skull and crossbones France Canada Quebec

    Default SETI at 50 years old


    SETI at 50
    We havent heard from ET. Is it time to re-think the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence?

    Written by Jason Zasky Filed under Science & Technology
    SETI at 50

    Are we alone in the universe? Thats the big question the Search for Extraterrestrial Intelligence (SETI) seeks to answer, and so far the answer appears to be yes. In the half-century since Frank Drake first used a radio telescope to begin searching for alien radio signals, there has been no message from ETindeed no artificial radio traffic of any description.

    SETI researchers argue that SETI has not been a failure, emphasizing that they have searched just a tiny fraction of the available space in the galaxy, and that the project is just getting started. To be sure, the computer revolution has enormously enhanced our ability to 1) search simultaneously over many different wavelengths, and 2) to filter out man-made signals, which theoretically increases the odds of a successful detection event.

    But in the forthcoming book The Eerie Silence (Houghton Mifflin Harcourt), British-born physicist/cosmologist/astrobiologist Paul DaviesDirector of the Beyond Center for Fundamental Concepts in Science, co-Director of the Cosmology Initiative (both at Arizona State University), and chairman of the SETI Post-Detection Taskgroupargues that SETI scientists ought to broaden their search beyond traditional SETI (i.e., radio messages) to include a search for general signatures of intelligence, wherever they may be imprinted in the physical universe. And that requires the resources of all the sciences, not just radio astronomy, he writes.

    I ventured to the Beyond Center in Tempe, Arizona, to meet with Davies and discuss the themes he explores in The Eerie Silence. In the following exchangethe first installment of a two-part Failure Interviewwe covered issues like: What has SETI accomplished in 50 years? And what are some of the ways Davies suggests expanding the search?

    In the meantime, the folks at the SETI Institute in Mountain View, California, continue to keep champagne on ice round-the-clock, in anticipation of the day scientists discover ET.

    Why dont we start by defining SETI?
    Fifty years ago, in a famous pilot experiment [at the U.S. National Radio Astronomy Observatory in Green Bank, West Virginia], Frank Drake first used a radio telescope to see if any messages from an extraterrestrial civilization might be coming our way. Using a radio telescope isnt the only way one can look for signs of intelligent life elsewhere in the universe, but its the most obvious way, because radio telescopes have the power to communicate across interstellar distances. So SETI, as its usually interpreted, is this radio telescope search.

    What has been accomplished in 50 years?
    The title of my bookAn Eerie Silencesays it all. There has been no definitive message from any civilization or indication of any artificial radio traffic. There have been a few intriguing dont knows [the Wow signal, a 72-second pulse detected on August 15, 1977, as well as a half-millisecond blip known as Lorimers pulse]transient events that are difficult to evaluate after-the-fact. But nothing where one can say: If you point your radio telescope to a certain part of the sky youll pick up a bleep-bleep from what looks like an artificial source.

    However, Drakes pioneering experiment was done with steam age technology. Since then the computer revolution has enormously increased our ability to search simultaneously over many different wavelengths and to filter out man-made signals. It is no longer necessary for an operator to sit at the controls, steer a dish, and listen on a loudspeaker. Its all done by computers and astronomers put their feet up.

    How do SETI researchers keep from getting discouraged?
    They are irrepressible, arent they? I think most of them take the point of view that they are doing good astronomy anyway. They are using state-of-the-art equipment and developing algorithms for searching through the signals, which is useful to do anyway. And they can always think that with improvements and more money they eventually will pick something up.

    Who pays for SETI research?
    Its almost all paid for by private donations. And the total cost is very modest by the standards of almost any sort of scientific venture. Its a drop in the ocean compared to what is being spent on other things.

    In the book you write about your belief that traditional SETI is stuck in a conceptual rut.
    Everyone is still enthralled with Carl Sagans vision, his idea being that there is a civilization out there that guesses were here, beams a message at us using what in technical jargon is called a narrow-band signal, and all we have to do is tune in and get the message and all sorts of wonderful consequences will ensue. I dont think that is credible. We need to look for signatures of intelligence wherever we might see them. And when it comes to radio, I think we should refocus to look for beacons, not narrow-band signals. The SETI community is slowly buying into this, but the majority of SETI has been with a narrow-band signal.

    How is it that something as bold and visionary as SETI became stuck in a rut?
    It is remarkable, isnt it? But I suppose the difficulty of the task means you have to focus on a particular strategy and then refine it and refine it. Theres always that tendency in science. What youre good at, what you understand, you do more of the same.

    How extensively have SETI researchers searched thus far?
    They have looked in a little bubble around our neighborhood, which is why the title of my book irritates the SETI people, who say, What do you expect? Weve only been doing it for 50 years.

    But if youre an optimist and you apply Moores Law to this, then within a few decades researchers can probably search the whole galaxy, and then the science will become much more significant. Its too soon to say its a waste of time to carry on with traditional SETI. I think its a great thing, but maybe after 50 years the public might be thinking, Can we try something else? And I think we should. We should think much more expansively about what a signature of intelligence might be. Forget messages, all we really want to know is: Is anyone out there? Their presence could be betrayed in a large number of ways.

    The public seems to assume that alien life, if it exists, would be reminiscent of human life. But biologists have recently discovered microbes living under extreme conditions. Whats to say that intelligent alien life cant live under extreme conditions?
    This is where youre on a sliding scale of speculation. The first speculation is: Maybe theres alien life, but its life as we know it. Lets be conservative and assume that life elsewhere would follow the pattern here. It would be carbon-based, require liquid water, would evolve over billions of years, and so on. Then you end up with the familiar features. We could easily speculate about radically different forms of life. Whether radically different forms of life could ever become intelligent is another matter.

    And if we encountered alien technology we might not be able to recognize it. There are some who go so far as to say that the entire universe is a product of alien technology, and the reason it all looks so gee-whiz and works so well is because its designed to do exactly that. But leaving aside that sort of wild speculation, the difficulty is to know how really advanced technology would manifest itself in a way that would make us sit up and take notice, without us saying, Its a miracle! Thats difficult because it requires us to think way beyond our current level of technology. We somehow have to keep our feet on the ground while staring into the sky.

    In the book you discuss how advances in technology have changed our thinkingor should change our thinkingin regards to SETI. Can you elaborate?
    First was the laser, most significantly. I think people [now] feel that ET would probably use laser signaling rather than radio signaling. More recently people have suggested more exotic types of signalingneutrinos being one possibility. I still feel that radio is probably best. But we might find evidence of alien activity thats not a message, but a footprint theyve left.

    There is another scenario, one which has nothing to do with electromagnetic or neutrino signaling, which is that ET might use biological organisms as a means of sending information. Genomes are packed full of information. If you could get a message into a cell somehow it would just replicate and replicate. If you could do that in a way that doesnt compromise the biological functionality of the host then youve got something that could endure for millions and millions of years. So rather than sending radio messages, I would be in favor of, for example, dispatching virusesretrovirusesthat would insert DNA into any DNA-based organisms. It costs nothing to search the genome, because people are sequencing genomes anyway. So why dont we search as many genomes as we can get our hands on, not just humanjust to see. Its a crazy idea, but then all of SETI is slightly crazy. I believe we should do what we can do easily and cheaply even if the chances of success are exceedingly small.

    What about the idea that aliens might be post-biological in nature?
    I believe that biological intelligence is a very transitory phase in the evolution of intelligence. If we, for example, get through the next few decadesthe bottleneck were facing now in terms of energy and environmentwe will see more and more a transition to transhumans and to human machine systems and ultimately to all-machine-type systems. The smartest entities on the planet will not be flesh and blood. Im sure that would be true of an advanced civilization anywhere else.

    We should get away from this Hollywood image [of alien life]. I went to see Avatar, which is spectacular for its 3D wonderworks but pathetic for its storyline. It commits all the usual sort of fallacies.

    Explain the implications of the speed of light on SETI, which seems an oft-overlooked factor.
    Yes, it has been brushed aside, and many science fiction fans overlook the speed of light. But if you believe the theory of relativitywhich almost all scientists dothen this is the fastest speed in the universe. Any type of physical interaction is limited to the speed of light. And though its fast by everyday standards, its slow by astronomical standards. It takes light about eight-and-a-half minutes to reach us from the sun; it takes over four years to reach us from the nearest star; it would take a hundred thousand years to reach us from the other side of the galaxy. The relevance here is that even in principle, our existence cannot be known beyond a certain distance. For example, a hundred light years away, an observer would see earth as it was a hundred years ago. So the existence of a technological community on Earthat the very least having radio capabilitycould not, even in principle, be known beyond a few dozen light years from Earth. If there was an advanced civilization within that distance, its not inconceivable that they have picked up our first radio messages and beamed something our way. But even SETI optimists dont think theres likely to be a civilization that close. I like to take a thousand light years as a good sort of guesstimate.

    When you put this to people who do SETI they reel around a bit, and say we could be dealing with a civilization that is so altruistic that it is prepared to beam messages to Earth based on a mere expectation that there might be [intelligent life here] in a few centuries or few millennia. It would make much more sense for them to wait for our first signals. They might as well just monitor us passively and then start beaming messages. I think the best we can hope for is to pick up a beacon that is broadcast to no one in particularor stumble across somebody elses messages going back and forth, much like eavesdropping on a telephone line. You have to be jolly lucky to be in the way, of course.

    Is SETI science or pseudoscience?
    When it began I think a lot of people felt it was pseudoscience; one might as well have expressed a belief in fairies, to be perfectly honest. But over the years it has become more respectable, and the SETI Institute now has a lot of joint projects with NASA, and many of these are astrobiology [as opposed to SETI]. So I think it qualifies for being a science, but ultimately we must have the usual standards of verification, and its obviously very speculative. Its speculative even by the standards of modern physics, which has a lot of weird and wacky stuff swirling around.

    So I would like to distinguish between the practice of SETI and the conceptual basis of SETI. The practice of SETI is thoroughly scientific. When you talk to the astronomers concerned, these are professional scientists, and their day-to-day work is of the highest standard. There isnt any doubt that they are going about their work in a scientific way. But the agenda itself is marginal. Its very much on the fringes of what can be considered scientifically respectable.

    What makes it acceptable to look for aliens, but not ghosts?
    This is very subtle but it has to do with the conceptual framework in which you fit it. Physics provides the best example. When physicists go looking for the Higgs bosonas they are at the moment at the Large Hadron Collidertheres a good body of theoretical work that has gone into that expectation, with precise predictions, even though it may not be there. The same is true for the neutrino, the famous ghostly particle that was postulated in the 1930s but wasnt definitively identified until the mid 1950s. Why did people spend time looking for this ghostly entity? Its because it had a well-defined place in physical theory.

    So when it comes to looking for aliens we have to convince ourselves that its a rational thing to look for. Some people might take the view that its a crazy and pointless exercise, but at least in the case of extraterrestrial life we know the sort of thing it is and can understand how it would evolve. When it comes to ghosts, to take your example, there is no credible theory. We can make no realistic predictions of where to look or how to look. We cant fit it in to a large body of scientific knowledge. That doesnt mean there are no ghosts. When it comes down to this shot in the dark, if you look for something that connects to an enormous body of well-defined, believable theory and experiments, its very different from plucking something that doesnt belong to science and saying, Well look for that too.

    Its clear you feel that SETIincluding traditional SETIis still worth pursuing, even though the odds of success are long.
    While the chances of success are very small, the consequences would be enormous. If they [SETI scientists] succeed, it will probably be the most momentous scientific discovery in history. So to allocate some small fraction of the worlds resources to addressing such a very deep question is certainly justified. And even if SETI fails, its very healthy that we address issues like: What is nature? What is humanity? What is our destiny? What do we mean by life? What do we mean by intelligence? What is our place in the universe? These are all good things to think about, even if we never pick up a signal.

    http://failuremag.com/index.php/site/print/seti_at_50/
    "Religion is the masterpiece of the art of animal training, for it trains people as to how they shall think." --Arthur Schopenhauer

    "All truth passes through three stages. First, it is ridiculed. Second, it is violently opposed. Third, it is accepted as being self-evident." ---Arthur Schopenhauer

  2. # ADS
    Advertisement bot
    Join Date
    2013-03-24
    Location
    ForumBiodiversity.com
    Age
    2010
    Posts
    All threads
       
     

  3. #2
    Established Member
    Molecular Biologist
    Last Online
    2010-10-07 @ 13:26
    Join Date
    2010-02-16
    Posts
    719
    Gender

    Default

    Interesting. If we are lucky we will find a signal soon, if we are not so lucky we maybe must wait for a very long time. We do not know how common life is in the Universe or how common intelligent life is. If we shall judge from our own planet life itself could be rather common (especially microbes) but intelligent, technologically advanced life rather rare. Lets say one intelligent civilisation will develop in every galaxy. We know that there are more than 100 billion galaxies out there so that would mean about 100 billion civilisations. But they are all very far away and if the civilisations is not very old any signals from them will not reach us for maybe many millions or even billions of years. An signals from Earth will take 2 million years just to reach the Andromeda galaxy wich is a close neigbour (the Magellanic clouds are closer, even if they are smaller).

    So the risk is that even if there are billions and billions civilisations out there it will take a looong time before we will know about them.

    But if we are lucky....

  4. #3
    QBQ Banned
    Molecular Biologist pinguin's Avatar
    Last Online
    2014-05-10 @ 20:45
    Join Date
    2009-12-21
    Posts
    7,252
    Location
    Chile
    Gender
    Ethnicity
    Chilean
    Phenotype
    Saddam Husseinic
    Politics
    Humanistic
    Religion
    Free market genetics
    Chile Chile Mapuche Spain traditional Amazigh Hispanidad

    Default

    Every year that pass, changes to find the green martians diminish.

    I wonder how many decades we will have to wait to give up finding fantasies on the sky.

  5. #4
    Established Member
    Molecular Biologist
    Last Online
    2010-10-07 @ 13:26
    Join Date
    2010-02-16
    Posts
    719
    Gender

    Default

    Intelligent life can indeed be hard to find but the chanses to find other life forms, or at least the conditions for life, is better. With good telescopes and other instruments one can for example measure the levels of oxygen in the atmosphere of extrasolar planets. Also large bodies of water could be detected on such planets from the reflections they give (experiments with this are going on right now).

Similar Threads

  1. Winter war - 70 years ago today
    By Motörhead Remember Me in forum Warfare
    Replies: 41
    Last Post: 2018-05-25, 19:50
  2. Classify this 22-years-old girl
    By tigereatmen in forum Classification Requests
    Replies: 5
    Last Post: 2010-02-20, 09:58
  3. How were human thousands of years ago?
    By Surena in forum Archaeological sub-disciplines
    Replies: 13
    Last Post: 2010-01-26, 07:17
  4. Replies: 30
    Last Post: 2010-01-25, 02:50
  5. How will the populations of England and France look like 100 years from now?
    By Sanjub_Saraswati in forum Race & Ethnicity in Society
    Replies: 125
    Last Post: 2010-01-09, 19:11

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
<