User Tag List

Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast
Results 11 to 20 of 98

Thread: Circumcision!847 days old

  1. #11
    Established Member
    Molecular Biologist MnM's Avatar
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 18:55
    Join Date
    2016-08-11
    Posts
    1,756
    Location
    Indiana
    Gender
    Race
    Americanoid
    Phenotype
    Mediterranid
    Metaethnos
    Roman
    Ethnicity
    American
    Phenotype
    Atlanto Med + Dinarid
    Politics
    Independent
    Religion
    Catholic
    United States Holy Roman Empire South Africa 1928-1994 Portugal Order of Christ Portugal

    Default

    Circumcision is a disgusting practice.
    Quote Originally Posted by Paul Essien View Post
    • The Grimaldi African occupied Europe in ancient times.
    • The original Celtic priesthood were Blacks.
    • Black people constructed Stonehenge.
    • The Scots are themselves of Black origin.
    • The Irish are of black origin.
    • The Knights of King Arthur's round table were Blacks.
    • There was an African, Gormund who ruled Ireland at the time of the Anglo-Saxons.
    • The first King to unite Norway was Black. He was known as Halfdan the Black.
    http://i.imgur.com/uSkUyji.jpg

  2. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to MnM For This Useful Post:

    randomguy1235 (2017-03-23), Rugevit (2017-03-23)

  3. # ADS
    Advertisement bot
    Join Date
    2013-03-24
    Location
    ForumBiodiversity.com
    Posts
    All threads
       
     

  4. #12
    Established Member
    CIVIS ROMANVS SVM
    Last Online
    @
    Join Date
    2010-11-06
    Posts
    2,694
    Gender
    Phenotype
    med - MENA
    Religion
    Physics

    Default

    Circumcision is totally fine but only for adult males.

    Quote Originally Posted by Evi View Post
    In my opinion, child's body has to be respected, and any invasive intervention that leads to permanent scars should be avoided, except for medical reasons. It applies not only to circumcision to boys, but also to ear piercing to girls etc.

    I really don't support the idea of putting earrings to tiny baby girls. It happens without any consent. It might look like a "small thing" to somebody, but principally it is wrong.
    Agreed. I see circumcision as a body modification, just like earrings on little girls (and sometimes boys) and piercings in general as well as stretching and tattoos. One should not choose to do body modification on people who can't give consent (children here). In the same way, I am against "fixing" (any kind of ablation) the genitalia of intersex children.

    It's not a big deal for most children and adult (not knowing how it feels to be intact plays a major role I think) but one cannot deny the occasional (and unfortunate) deaths as well as the growing number of men who wish they had a choice.
    Last edited by Tsukonin; 2017-03-23 at 16:25.

  5. The Following 2 Users Say Thank You to Tsukonin For This Useful Post:

    randomguy1235 (2017-03-23), Rugevit (2017-03-23)

  6. #13
    Established Member
    Molecular Biologist Rugevit's Avatar
    Last Online
    Today @ 05:50
    Join Date
    2013-12-04
    Posts
    2,923
    Gender
    Metaethnos
    Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Belarusian
    Lithuania Grand Duchy

    Default

    Holes in ears for earrings are not the same as circumcision of boys in my opinion. Girls and women want to have earrings. Certain women look beautiful with earrings. On the other hand grown men don't want to have their foreskin missing despite what women say about sexual experiences with men having no foreskin.

  7. The Following User Says Thank You to Rugevit For This Useful Post:

    Tsukonin (2017-03-23)

  8. #14
    Established Member
    Evolutionary Biologist rhiannon's Avatar
    Last Online
    @
    Join Date
    2012-04-06
    Posts
    563
    Location
    Pacific Northwest
    Gender
    mtDNA
    X2a1b
    Race
    Europid
    Phenotype
    Cromagnid
    Metaethnos
    CeltoGermanic
    Ethnicity
    Mongrel American
    Politics
    Left of Center
    Religion
    Agnostic
    United States United Kingdom England Germany Ireland Scotland

    Default

    My husband had final say regarding our son, for obvious reason.

  9. The Following User Says Thank You to rhiannon For This Useful Post:

    Rugevit (2017-03-23)

  10. #15
    Established Member
    CIVIS ROMANVS SVM
    Last Online
    @
    Join Date
    2010-11-06
    Posts
    2,694
    Gender
    Phenotype
    med - MENA
    Religion
    Physics

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Rugevit View Post
    Holes in ears for earrings are not the same as circumcision of boys in my opinion. Girls and women want to have earrings. Certain women look beautiful with earrings. On the other hand grown men don't want to have their foreskin missing despite what women say about sexual experiences with men having no foreskin.
    It's not exactly the same thing but it's a traumatizing experience for younger girls from what I remember. And just as a matter of principle, it makes sense to me that we should go in the direction of not modifying a child's body except for medical reasons: circumcision for some types of phimosis (moderate and severe) is justified.

    As for women, I don't think it makes any difference to them when it comes to the sexual experience. The foreskin doesn't bring anything to the table pleasure-wise, except for the man ofc.

  11. #16
    Established Member
    Molecular Biologist Danielion's Avatar
    Last Online
    @
    Join Date
    2011-01-18
    Posts
    5,690
    Location
    Antwerpen
    Gender
    Y-DNA
    R-L21
    mtDNA
    K1
    Metaethnos
    Celto-Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Blemish
    Flanders lion Netherlands European Union Belgium

    Default

    In the past not just Americans but also Brits used to circumcise boys frequently as a practice. The reason behind it was the same as why Americans introduced it: to prevent masturbation which according to the medical science of the past was believed to be linked to mental illnesses. In both the UK as the US a counter-movement came to being, the one in the UK prevailed and the practice was halted, whereas in the US that movement lost and most still have their sons circumcised. The current reason Americans do it today is out of habit and because they had been circumcised themselves.

    Forgive my lack of dates and source material, I'm on my phone.

    - - - Updated - - -

    About lasting long:

    I'm not circumcised and I can get it up soon after climaxing and I can last very long (the second and third times usually a lot longer with even stronger climaxes). Especially in the morning I can. Better performance without foreskin is wish-believe.
    Last edited by Danielion; 2017-03-23 at 17:15.
    "Political correctness is the (...) revenge of the (...) intolerant, (...) dunce upon all the liveliness in this world. It is no more than the (...) resort of minds (...) that, for them, a revival of Stalinism is preferable to the pain of a glimpse of self-it's the last sigh of the beast that Nietzsche identified as ressentiment."

  12. The Following User Says Thank You to Danielion For This Useful Post:

    Rugevit (2017-03-23)

  13. #17
    Moderator
    Knight Templar El Andullero's Avatar
    Last Online
    @
    Join Date
    2010-01-24
    Posts
    8,950
    Location
    Santo Domingo
    Gender
    Age
    36
    Y-DNA
    R-U152
    mtDNA
    L0a2a1a
    Race
    Triracial
    Phenotype
    Indid
    Metaethnos
    Caribbean Hispanic
    Ethnicity
    Dominican
    Politics
    Royalism
    Religion
    Catholicism
    GEDmatch
    HB6236866
    Dominican Republic Santiago de los Caballeros Spain traditional Spain African Union(OAS)

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danielion View Post
    In the past not just Americans but also Brits used to circumcise boys frequently as a practice. The reason behind it was the same as why Americans introduced it: to prevent masturbation which according to the medical science of the past was believed to be linked to mental illnesses.
    That, and Protestant Jew wannabe-ism.

  14. #18
    Established Member
    Molecular Biologist Danielion's Avatar
    Last Online
    @
    Join Date
    2011-01-18
    Posts
    5,690
    Location
    Antwerpen
    Gender
    Y-DNA
    R-L21
    mtDNA
    K1
    Metaethnos
    Celto-Germanic
    Ethnicity
    Blemish
    Flanders lion Netherlands European Union Belgium

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Tsukonin View Post
    It's not exactly the same thing but it's a traumatizing experience for younger girls from what I remember. And just as a matter of principle, it makes sense to me that we should go in the direction of not modifying a child's body except for medical reasons: circumcision for some types of phimosis (moderate and severe) is justified.

    As for women, I don't think it makes any difference to them when it comes to the sexual experience. The foreskin doesn't bring anything to the table pleasure-wise, except for the man ofc.
    Once had my left ear pierced. Didn't hurt one bit for some reason. Odd comparison in my opinion.
    "Political correctness is the (...) revenge of the (...) intolerant, (...) dunce upon all the liveliness in this world. It is no more than the (...) resort of minds (...) that, for them, a revival of Stalinism is preferable to the pain of a glimpse of self-it's the last sigh of the beast that Nietzsche identified as ressentiment."

  15. #19
    Established Member
    Molecular Biologist Rugevit's Avatar
    Last Online
    Today @ 05:50
    Join Date
    2013-12-04
    Posts
    2,923
    Gender
    Metaethnos
    Slavic
    Ethnicity
    Belarusian
    Lithuania Grand Duchy

    Default

    Quote Originally Posted by Danielion View Post
    In the past not just Americans but also Brits used to circumcise boys frequently as a practice. The reason behind it was the same as why Americans introduced it: to prevent masturbation which according to the medical science of the past was believed to be linked to mental illnesses. .
    Circumcision of boys to prevent masturbation? That's funny. I was circumcised for medical purposes. I can tell you I felt masturbating when I was a teen.

  16. #20
    Established Member
    Molecular Biologist Garibald's Avatar
    Last Online
    Yesterday @ 22:33
    Join Date
    2016-11-09
    Posts
    603
    Gender
    Race
    Europid
    Phenotype
    Alpinid
    Politics
    Shmuley Poley
    Religion
    anonymous Cathoholics
    Germany Bavaria Holy Roman Empire

    Default

    America had quite a lot of inventions to prevent boys from masturbation:
    https://blogs.scientificamerican.com...illustrations/

  17. The Following User Says Thank You to Garibald For This Useful Post:

    Pioterus (2017-03-24)

Page 2 of 10 FirstFirst 1 2 3 4 ... LastLast

Similar Threads

  1. Male And Female Circumcision
    By ariaka in forum Current Affairs & Politics
    Replies: 83
    Last Post: 2018-12-01, 00:34
  2. Is circumcision still relevant?
    By XMidnightX in forum Behavioural Neuroscience
    Replies: 386
    Last Post: 2013-01-08, 22:09
  3. German court bans circumcision of young boys
    By Ubirajara in forum Religion
    Replies: 181
    Last Post: 2012-12-14, 21:43
  4. Religious circumcision barbaric?
    By Skomand in forum Race & Ethnicity in Society
    Replies: 12
    Last Post: 2012-12-13, 20:48
  5. Replies: 68
    Last Post: 2011-09-24, 03:42

Posting Permissions

  • You may not post new threads
  • You may not post replies
  • You may not post attachments
  • You may not edit your posts
  •  
<